Equality and Freedom in the Workplace: Recovering Republican Insights
نویسنده
چکیده
In this paper, I focus on a domain in which the conflict between freedom and equality is at stake: the world of work. Current U.S. laws impose many negative liberty restraints on employers with respect to employees. They may not discriminate by race, gender, religion, or age. They must pay minimum wages to most employees, and pay overtime to those working more than 40 hours per week. They must pay wages in cash, not scrip. They must bargain in good faith with any labor union their employees elect to represent them, and may not fire any employee for joining it or urging others to do so. They are subject to workplace safety standards imposed by OSHA. These laws are justified at least in part in terms of equality: antidiscrimination laws directly aim to secure equality among workers; unionization laws aim to equalize workers’ bargaining power with employers; other laws aim to correct for unequal bargaining power.
منابع مشابه
Copyrighted Material THE SPANISH CONTEXT
new world, but to make everyone’s world better and better, and to allow them to participate in defining it. (Prego 2001) The interviewer highlighted Zapatero’s defense of freedom as a central value and then asked him how in his view freedom could be reconciled with the Left, since promoting it seemed to produce social inequalities. This was Zapatero’s reply: The pursuit of freedom, of the human...
متن کاملThe Impossibility of a Paretian Republican?
Philip Pettit (2001) has suggested that there are parallels between his republican account of freedom and Amartya Sen’s (1970) account of freedom as decisive preference. In this paper, I discuss these parallels from a social-choice-theoretic perspective. I sketch a formalization of republican freedom, and argue that republican freedom is formally very similar to freedom as defined in Sen’s “min...
متن کاملRepublican Freedom and the Rule of Law
At the core of republican thought, on Philip Pettit’s account, lies the conception of freedom as non-domination as opposed to freedom as non-interference in the liberal sense. I revisit the distinction between liberal and republican freedom and argue that republican freedom incorporates a particular rule-oflaw requirement, whereas liberal freedom does not. Liberals may also endorse such a requi...
متن کاملThe impossibility of a Paretian republican? Some comments on Pettit and Sen
Philip Pettit (2001) has suggested that there are parallels between his republican account of freedom and Amartya Sen’s (1970) account of freedom as decisive preference. In this paper, I discuss these parallels from a social-choice-theoretic perspective. I sketch a formalization of republican freedom, and argue that republican freedom is formally very similar to freedom as defined in Sen’s “min...
متن کاملHuman Honour and its Requirements from Quran’s Perspective
Human honour is one of the principal categories of the contemporary thought. After semantic analysis of human honour in the meaning system of holy Quran, the paper attempts to deal with the verses which are related to the results and requirements of human honour in Quranic discourse and also to achieve the mentioned requirements from the perspective of various verses about it. Regarding the res...
متن کامل